A research-intelligence platform for transparent journal evaluation, responsible metrics and verifiable scholarly records.
Two clearly identified pathways preserve selectivity while supporting responsible development across disciplines, languages and regions.
For journals meeting advanced requirements in governance, peer review, ethics, citation integrity and technical publishing.
For legitimate developing, regional, institutional, multilingual and emerging journals meeting published baseline requirements.
Each public evaluation connects its decision to observable evidence. Criteria, method versions and limitations stay visible with the record.
Policies, corrections, ownership and ethical safeguards.
Governance, peer review and editorial independence.
Disclosed coverage, data periods and calculation parameters.
Persistent identity, metadata, archives and accessibility.
Discoverability, continuity and responsible dissemination.
SIIFI separates journal-quality assessment from citation performance. Every released result must disclose its method, data period, coverage and limitations.
Explore the methodologyEditorial, ethical, technical, governance and transparency criteria.
Journal-level citation evidence with disclosed calculation parameters.
Public reports are designed to show how a result was produced, when it applies and where interpretation should stop.
Routine validation supports consistency. Final decisions, appeals and public releases remain accountable human actions.
Journal identity, policies and supporting evidence are supplied.
Completeness, ISSN format and duplicate records are checked.
Evidence is assessed against the published criteria.
A qualified human reviewer confirms the final decision.
Approved status, method version and verification record go live.
Published profiles connect journal identity, evaluation track, method version and status history in one verifiable record.
Verified journal records appear here after publication from the SIIFI system.
Confirm the journal name, ISSN, evaluation track, public status, issue date, methodology version and certificate validity against the live SIIFI record.
Submit journal information, respond to evidence requests, follow evaluation progress and maintain approved public metadata.
Access publisher workspaceEssential information about independence, scope and decision-making.
Yes. SIIFI develops and publishes its own journal-evaluation framework, indicators and verification records.
No. SIIFI separates multidimensional quality assessment from citation performance and explains the scope and limitations of each result.
Yes. Eligible journals may apply to the pathway that reflects their evidence and maturity. The two pathways have clearly different thresholds.
No. Automation supports validation and evidence organisation; final approval, rejection, suspension and appeals remain human decisions.
