01
Selective pathwaySIIFI Select
For journals meeting advanced requirements in governance, peer review, ethics, citation integrity and technical publishing.
- Higher evidence threshold
- Periodic re-evaluation
- Full status history
Independent Journal EvaluationCitation Analytics
Evidence for journals.
Clarity for scholarship.
A research-intelligence platform for transparent journal evaluation, responsible metrics and verifiable scholarly records.
Transparent criteria
Independent assessment
Verifiable status
Evaluation architecture Methodology-led
Publishing integrityEditorial qualityCitation evidenceTechnical standardsResearch visibility
Evaluation tracks02
Decision modelHuman-reviewed
Find a journalSearch the SIIFI journal directory
A disciplined scholarly directory
Evaluation with a visible standard.
Two clearly identified pathways preserve selectivity while supporting responsible development across disciplines and regions.
02
Standard pathwaySIIFI Standard
For legitimate developing, regional, institutional, multilingual and emerging journals meeting baseline requirements.
- Transparent baseline criteria
- Improvement-focused review
- Clearly labelled status
Responsible journal intelligence
Metrics that explain—not merely rank.
SIIFI separates journal-quality assessment from citation performance and publishes the method, data period and limitations alongside every score.
Explore the methodologyEditorial, ethical, technical and transparency criteria.
Journal-level citation evidence with disclosed parameters.
How evaluation works
Automated where efficient. Human where essential.
Submit
Journal information, policies and supporting evidence.
Validate
Automated completeness, identity and duplication checks.
Evaluate
Structured scoring followed by independent human review.
Publish
Approved status, methodology version and verification record.
Publisher workspace
Publisher access