Journal publishers
Publisher or owning-organisation representatives.
Submit your journal for an evidence-led review of publishing transparency, editorial standards, technical quality, citation evidence and scholarly visibility.
View Evaluation & MetricsSubmission creates an application record and may create a Journal List entry with a pending status. It does not provide an evaluation score, ranking, certificate or approval.
Complete the application in clear steps. You may save a draft, verify your email and return before final submission.
The applicant must be authorised to provide journal information and respond to verification requests.
Publisher or owning-organisation representatives.
Editors-in-chief and managing editors.
Societies, universities and research organisations.
People formally authorised to act for the journal.
Keep these public pages and records ready. Links should be available without passwords or private access.
Contact Evaluation SupportYour preference is not a final track assignment. SIIFI confirms the appropriate pathway after eligibility review.
A higher-threshold review for journals with established publishing evidence, stable governance and mature technical records.
A rigorous evidence-led pathway for legitimate developing, regional, institutional, multilingual, general and emerging journals.
Submit the available evidence. The eligibility team will determine which published threshold is appropriate.
Track recommendation is not approval or a predicted result.
A secure application record is created and the applicant email is verified.
ISSN, journal identity, website, policies and possible duplicate records are checked.
A fee is requested only after eligibility. Payment never determines the outcome.
Evidence is assessed under the assigned methodology and reviewed by an authorised person.
Only an approved public status or result is released, with continuing record controls.
Automated systems may assist with identity checks, metadata validation, duplication detection, website analysis and evidence preparation. Every final evaluation decision and public result release requires authorised human approval.
Evaluation fees cover evaluation processing and evidence review. Payment does not guarantee approval, a favourable score, a ranking position, a certificate or continued public inclusion.
Understand what submission, listing, payment and evaluation mean before you apply.
No. Applying creates an application record. A pending Journal List entry is not an evaluation, score, ranking or certificate.
The evaluation fee is requested only after the journal passes the configured eligibility review. The amount and currency are confirmed before payment.
No. Payment covers evaluation administration and evidence review. It does not guarantee any outcome.
A public pending record helps scholars and publishers see that an application exists and understand its current stage. The record clearly states when no evaluation result has been released.
The applicant may state a preference. SIIFI confirms the final track after reviewing the journal’s evidence and maturity.
Automation may validate structured information and organise evidence. It cannot make or release the final evaluation decision.
Yes. Draft information may be edited before submission. Later corrections and evidence responses are handled through the Publisher Dashboard or evaluation support.
Contact the SIIFI Evaluation Office at evaluation@siifi.org.
Send your application question from an official journal or institutional email address.