Independent scholarly metrics evaluation@siifi.org
Independent Journal Evaluation

Apply for Independent Journal Evaluation

Submit your journal for an evidence-led review of publishing transparency, editorial standards, technical quality, citation evidence and scholarly visibility.

View Evaluation & Metrics
Controlled evaluation pathway Human decision gate
  1. 01Journal recordStructured application
  2. 02IdentityVerification checks
  3. 03EligibilityEvidence readiness
  4. 04EvaluationMethodology-led review
  5. 05DecisionAuthorised release

Applying is not the same as being evaluated.

Submission creates an application record and may create a Journal List entry with a pending status. It does not provide an evaluation score, ranking, certificate or approval.

Secure application

Journal evaluation application

Complete the application in clear steps. You may save a draft, verify your email and return before final submission.

Step 1 of 8Applicant details

Tell us who is authorised to submit and respond for the journal.

A verification link will be sent after the draft is saved.
Authorised applicants

Who may apply?

The applicant must be authorised to provide journal information and respond to verification requests.

Journal publishers

Publisher or owning-organisation representatives.

Editorial leadership

Editors-in-chief and managing editors.

Scholarly institutions

Societies, universities and research organisations.

Authorised representatives

People formally authorised to act for the journal.

Application readiness

Before you begin

Keep these public pages and records ready. Links should be available without passwords or private access.

Contact Evaluation Support
  • Official journal website and valid ISSN
  • Publisher, ownership and editorial-board details
  • Peer-review and publication-ethics policies
  • Current issue and complete journal archive
  • Author guidelines, copyright and licensing
  • Corrections, retractions, complaints and appeals
  • Digital preservation and technical metadata
  • Recent publication and supporting evidence
Evaluation pathways

Choose a preferred evaluation track

Your preference is not a final track assignment. SIIFI confirms the appropriate pathway after eligibility review.

selective pathway

Selective Evaluation

A higher-threshold review for journals with established publishing evidence, stable governance and mature technical records.

Intended for
Established journals seeking SIIFI’s more selective evaluation pathway.
Evidence focus
Documented peer review, publishing continuity, ethics, editorial independence, article metadata, preservation and reviewable citation evidence.
Evaluation fee
Confirmed after eligibility review
standard pathway

Standard Evaluation

A rigorous evidence-led pathway for legitimate developing, regional, institutional, multilingual, general and emerging journals.

Intended for
Developing and established journals that meet baseline identity, transparency, editorial and publishing requirements.
Evidence focus
Verifiable identity, scholarly content, editorial information, peer-review disclosure, ethics policies, publishing continuity and authentic ownership.
Evaluation fee
Confirmed after eligibility review
Unsure?

Let SIIFI recommend a track

Submit the available evidence. The eligibility team will determine which published threshold is appropriate.

Track recommendation is not approval or a predicted result.

Transparent workflow

What happens after submission?

  1. 01

    Submit and verify

    A secure application record is created and the applicant email is verified.

  2. 02

    Identity and eligibility

    ISSN, journal identity, website, policies and possible duplicate records are checked.

  3. 03

    Payment and evidence

    A fee is requested only after eligibility. Payment never determines the outcome.

  4. 04

    Evaluation and decision

    Evidence is assessed under the assigned methodology and reviewed by an authorised person.

  5. 05

    Result and monitoring

    Only an approved public status or result is released, with continuing record controls.

Responsible automation

Automation assists. People decide.

Automated systems may assist with identity checks, metadata validation, duplication detection, website analysis and evidence preparation. Every final evaluation decision and public result release requires authorised human approval.

Automation may assist with

  • ISSN and metadata validation
  • Duplicate-record detection
  • Policy-page and evidence organisation
  • Completeness and anomaly flags

Human authorisation is required for

  • Eligibility and track confirmation
  • Final evaluation decision
  • Score or indicator release
  • Certificate issuance or suspension

Fees support evaluation—not outcomes.

Evaluation fees cover evaluation processing and evidence review. Payment does not guarantee approval, a favourable score, a ranking position, a certificate or continued public inclusion.

Clear answers

Application questions

Understand what submission, listing, payment and evaluation mean before you apply.

Does applying mean the journal is evaluated?

No. Applying creates an application record. A pending Journal List entry is not an evaluation, score, ranking or certificate.

When is the evaluation fee requested?

The evaluation fee is requested only after the journal passes the configured eligibility review. The amount and currency are confirmed before payment.

Does payment guarantee approval?

No. Payment covers evaluation administration and evidence review. It does not guarantee any outcome.

Why may a pending journal appear in the Journal List?

A public pending record helps scholars and publishers see that an application exists and understand its current stage. The record clearly states when no evaluation result has been released.

Can the journal choose its final track?

The applicant may state a preference. SIIFI confirms the final track after reviewing the journal’s evidence and maturity.

How does SIIFI use AI or automation?

Automation may validate structured information and organise evidence. It cannot make or release the final evaluation decision.

Can submitted information be corrected?

Yes. Draft information may be edited before submission. Later corrections and evidence responses are handled through the Publisher Dashboard or evaluation support.

Who can help with the application?

Contact the SIIFI Evaluation Office at evaluation@siifi.org.

Evaluation support

Need help before submitting?

Send your application question from an official journal or institutional email address.

evaluation@siifi.org